Who Are Gig Workers and How are They Faring: Some Surprising and Some Not-so-surprising Findings from the New Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey
Jun 15, 2018, 00:00 AM
Who Are Gig Workers and How are They Faring: Some Surprising and Some Not-so-surprising Findings from the New Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey
Super Text :
Full Content Date :
June 15, 2018
Full Content Page Count :
Volume Number :
While the term “gig economy” may conjure images of Millennials
driving for Uber, the reality is that workers in alternative employment
arrangements are far more likely to be Gen Xers or Baby Boomers. This is
the evidence from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) recently
released Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements
supplement. The survey finds that 10.6 million workers identified
themselves as independent contractors—6.9 percent of total employment.
Of this group, by far the largest cohort is workers ages 55 or older: 37
percent. This compares to the 22 percent of workers with traditional
work arrangements that are in this age cohort. Granted, many of the
independent contractors do not have mobile app-based employment: 25
percent describe themselves as being in professional and business
services. However, a 2018 Financial Attitudes & Behaviors Toward the Gig Economy
survey by T. Rowe Price shows that older – not younger – workers are
more likely to have gig work: 9 percent of Millennials identify
themselves as earning income in the gig economy, compared to 19 percent
of Gen Xers and 11 percent of Baby Boomers.
On the positive side, the BLS reports that 79 percent of independent
contractors prefer their work arrangements to traditional jobs. However,
the report also notes that, in general, the proportion of workers in
alternative employment arrangements who actually participate in
employer-provided retirement plans is lower
than for those in traditional arrangements. The 2017 Gig Worker On-demand Economy
survey by Prudential confirms this, finding that only 16 percent of
gig-only workers say they have access to employer-sponsored retirement
plans (and this could also be from previous employers or via their
spouse), compared to 52 percent of full-time workers. Traditional
workers are nearly six times as likely to have access to benefits such
as life insurance as gig-only workers. As Jake Biscoglio of Prudential
Financial pointed out at EBRI’s “Exploring the Gig Economy” panel at its
38th Policy Forum, access to benefits is the number one challenge
reported by gig workers.
Chances are, these older gig workers are not securing their financial
wellbeing on their own. For example, only 10.2 percent of workers in
that age category contribute to an IRA, with a median IRA balance for
such workers standing at $51,400.
At EBRI’s recent Policy Forum, Julie Stitzel, managing director of
Policy and Strategic Initiatives at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
attributed the lack of benefits for gig workers to outdated labor laws,
noting that Chamber members are hesitant to push the envelope when it
comes to providing benefits because of reclassification risk. She gave
the example of one well-known gig employer that has partnered with
online financial advisor Betterment to help contractors save their
money. The Betterment service is provided for free in the first year and
is discounted to independent contractors in the second. But the gig
employer does not believe it can go beyond providing this simple
integration with Betterment out of concern of running afoul of
reclassification risk, according to Stitzel. In other words, gig
employers may want to provide benefits to their contractors—and may even
seek creative solutions to do so—but they feel hamstrung in their
efforts given current labor laws.
In the Policy Forum, a wide range of possible solutions was discussed
for drawing gig workers into the retirement system, including a
possible federal retirement marketplace solution similar to what is
being offered in New Jersey and Washington State; more widespread
availability of open multiple employer plans; or employer-sponsored
defined contribution plans that can be ported between traditional and
nontraditional employers.
But one widely agreed-upon theme at the Policy Forum was that any
good policy solution will require good data. As such, the fact that the
BLS has even fielded the recent Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements
survey is a step in the right direction: this is the first time the
survey has been conducted since 2005. We might note that good policy
solutions also require good analysis. The Employee Benefit Research
Institute (EBRI) will continue to work with available data such as that
of the BLS survey to bring into focus the true state of gig workers’
overall wellbeing.
Full Content Product / Source :
EBRI Blog
Access Package :
PUBLIC
Full Content Fielded Links
EBRI Blog
Who Are Gig Workers and How are They Faring: Some Surprising and Some Not-so-surprising Findings from the New Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey
While the term “gig economy” may conjure images of Millennials
driving for Uber, the reality is that workers in alternative employment
arrangements are far more likely to be Gen Xers or Baby Boomers. This is
the evidence from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) recently
released Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements
supplement. The survey finds that 10.6 million workers identified
themselves as independent contractors—6.9 percent of total employment.
Of this group, by far the largest cohort is workers ages 55 or older: 37
percent. This compares to the 22 percent of workers with traditional
work arrangements that are in this age cohort. Granted, many of the
independent contractors do not have mobile app-based employment: 25
percent describe themselves as being in professional and business
services. However, a 2018 Financial Attitudes & Behaviors Toward the Gig Economy
survey by T. Rowe Price shows that older – not younger – workers are
more likely to have gig work: 9 percent of Millennials identify
themselves as earning income in the gig economy, compared to 19 percent
of Gen Xers and 11 percent of Baby Boomers.
On the positive side, the BLS reports that 79 percent of independent
contractors prefer their work arrangements to traditional jobs. However,
the report also notes that, in general, the proportion of workers in
alternative employment arrangements who actually participate in
employer-provided retirement plans is lower
than for those in traditional arrangements. The 2017 Gig Worker On-demand Economy
survey by Prudential confirms this, finding that only 16 percent of
gig-only workers say they have access to employer-sponsored retirement
plans (and this could also be from previous employers or via their
spouse), compared to 52 percent of full-time workers. Traditional
workers are nearly six times as likely to have access to benefits such
as life insurance as gig-only workers. As Jake Biscoglio of Prudential
Financial pointed out at EBRI’s “Exploring the Gig Economy” panel at its
38th Policy Forum, access to benefits is the number one challenge
reported by gig workers.
Chances are, these older gig workers are not securing their financial
wellbeing on their own. For example, only 10.2 percent of workers in
that age category contribute to an IRA, with a median IRA balance for
such workers standing at $51,400.
At EBRI’s recent Policy Forum, Julie Stitzel, managing director of
Policy and Strategic Initiatives at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
attributed the lack of benefits for gig workers to outdated labor laws,
noting that Chamber members are hesitant to push the envelope when it
comes to providing benefits because of reclassification risk. She gave
the example of one well-known gig employer that has partnered with
online financial advisor Betterment to help contractors save their
money. The Betterment service is provided for free in the first year and
is discounted to independent contractors in the second. But the gig
employer does not believe it can go beyond providing this simple
integration with Betterment out of concern of running afoul of
reclassification risk, according to Stitzel. In other words, gig
employers may want to provide benefits to their contractors—and may even
seek creative solutions to do so—but they feel hamstrung in their
efforts given current labor laws.
In the Policy Forum, a wide range of possible solutions was discussed
for drawing gig workers into the retirement system, including a
possible federal retirement marketplace solution similar to what is
being offered in New Jersey and Washington State; more widespread
availability of open multiple employer plans; or employer-sponsored
defined contribution plans that can be ported between traditional and
nontraditional employers.
But one widely agreed-upon theme at the Policy Forum was that any
good policy solution will require good data. As such, the fact that the
BLS has even fielded the recent Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements
survey is a step in the right direction: this is the first time the
survey has been conducted since 2005. We might note that good policy
solutions also require good analysis. The Employee Benefit Research
Institute (EBRI) will continue to work with available data such as that
of the BLS survey to bring into focus the true state of gig workers’
overall wellbeing.